- The Pulse Newsletter
- Posts
- Siegel Urges Fed to Cut Rates—Is It Time?
Siegel Urges Fed to Cut Rates—Is It Time?
Economist Jeremy Siegel calls for aggressive rate cuts. Not everyone agrees.
The Week in Review
Weekly Market Recap: U.S. and Canada
If you’ve been looking for evidence that you can’t read a book by its cover, here you go! Take a casual glance at this week’s chart of index returns and you’d swear it was a great week. Other than Wednesday’s drop, the lines slope to the right the whole way. Lower left and higher right generally means it was a good week.
Week ending August 9, 2024
What this chart doesn’t tell us, though, is where those same lines ended last week. That, of course, is far above Monday’s opening level as we opened the week with the biggest sell-off in nearly two years.
On Monday, the S&P 500 dropped 1.6%, the TSX was down 1.2%, the Dow Jones lost 1.3% and the Nasdaq Composite fell nearly 2.1%. So, the bar was set low right out of the gate.
So ya, by the end of the week all indices ended up either slightly up or slightly down, not a bad result considering how we started.
S&P 500 Returns | Week At-a-Glance
Week ending August 9, 2024 | Market Cap >$100B
TSX Returns | Week At-a-Glance
Week ending August 9, 2024 | Market Cap >$10B
Major Economic Stories This Week
Canada’s Unemployment Rate Holds Steady
Canada's unemployment rate remained unchanged at 6.4% in July, defying expectations of a slight increase to 6.5%.
Canada Unemployment Rate | July 2024
Despite this, the labor market showed signs of weakness, with a second consecutive decline in net employment and a drop in the labor force participation rate to its lowest level in over two decades, excluding pandemic-related disruptions. While the number of unemployed decreased, this was largely due to fewer people actively seeking work.
Unemployment rate remained at 6.4%.
Labor force participation rate dropped to 65%.
Unemployment rose for young men to 16%.
Core-aged women’s unemployment fell slightly to 4.9%.
Employment in Canada Disappoints in July
Even though Canada’s unemployment rate stayed the same, we saw a huge miss in actual employment numbers. Employment for the month of July was down by 2,800 workers, coming in way below the forecast of 22,500.
Canada Employment Change | July 2024
Full full-time jobs increased, but we saw a sharp decline in part-time positions. Specific sectors like retail and finance experienced losses, while public administration and transportation saw gains.
Employment fell by 2,800 in July
Full-time jobs increased by 62,000, while part-time jobs were down by 64,000.
Wholesale and retail trade saw a decline of 44,000 jobs.
Ontario gained 22,000 jobs, while Manitoba lost 5,400 jobs.
US Jobless Claims Below Market Expectations
In the US, unemployment benefit claims dropped by 17,000 to 233,000 for the period ending August 3, beating market expectations. However, the overall job market shows signs of softening, with the moving average of claims hitting a yearly high. The outstanding claims also rose to the highest since November 2021.
Initial jobless claims fell by 17,000 to 233,000.
Four-week moving average rose to 240.75K.
Outstanding claims reached 1,875K, the highest since November 2021.
Claims dropped notably in Michigan and Texas.
Key Takeaways From this Week’s Economic News
Employment Decline in Canada
The decline in overall employment in Canada, especially in part-time positions, could be a signal that we're seeing a shift in labor market dynamics.
In particular, when we see this discrepancy between full-time and part-time employment, it might be reflecting a changing workforce demand or economic uncertainty, which could lead to potentially weaker consumer spending and by extension, a cautious approach from businesses.
Stable Unemployment Rate Despite Softening Labor Market
The stable unemployment rate at 6.4%, despite falling employment, emphasizes the significant drop in the labor force participation rate. This reduction could point to more people leaving the workforce due to retirement, discouragement, or other factors, which might mask the true extent of job market weakness. A declining participation rate can strain economic growth, reducing the potential for consumer spending and overall economic productivity.
US Jobless Claims Indicate Ongoing Labor Market Softness
The drop in US jobless claims to 230K, while better than expected, still reflects a labor market that is cooling down. The rise in the four-week moving average suggests persistent challenges in the job market, even as headline numbers improve. This could indicate that while layoffs have slowed, the hiring rate has also cooled, which may weigh on future economic growth prospects if the trend continues.
THIS WEEK’S POLL QUESTION
(Results in Next Week’s Newsletter)
In an article below, I take a look at former president Donald Trump’s proposal that the President should have more of an influence on the Federal Reserve. I’m curious as to what your thoughts are on this? Vote Now!
Do you agree with Donald Trump's suggestion that the US president should have a say in Federal Reserve interest rate decisions? |
LAST WEEK’S POLL RESULTS
Not. Even. Close.
The vast majority of our readers believe that the last US unemployment numbers are a sign that we may be heading into rough waters. Indeed, we have heard more and more ‘R’ Word chatter lately, so the community might just be onto something.
✅ Answered More Issues to Come
“It only makes sense that things will slow substantially with interest rates being so high for a while now. It takes a while for the impact of the higher rates to trickle through the economy and we are seeing that start now.”
- premierdentsolutions
THE ECONOMY
Jeremy Siegel Urges Aggressive Fed Rate Cuts, Warns of Policy Mistakes
Key Points:
Economist Jeremy Siegel argues that the Federal Reserve should cut interest rates quickly.
Siegel criticizes Fed Chair Jerome Powell for being too cautious and slow in decision-making.
Siegel suggests a 50-basis-point rate cut is necessary to correct past policy errors.
Market expert Ed Yardeni disagrees, labeling Siegel’s stance as "overly alarmist."
Economist Jeremy Siegel is calling for the Federal Reserve to take swift and significant action to lower interest rates, arguing that the current rates are "far too high" and could lead to further economic missteps. In a recent interview with BNN Bloomberg, Siegel, a finance professor emeritus at the Wharton School and senior economist at WisdomTree, criticized the Fed for being too slow in cutting rates and warned that this cautious approach could be another policy mistake.
"The Fed funds rate is far too high, and I do not want the Fed to repeat the policy mistake it made three years ago of being way, way too late in raising rates.”
He expressed concern that the Fed's reluctance to reduce rates, despite the unemployment rate slightly exceeding the Fed’s target, is "very puzzling."
Siegel advocates for a substantial rate cut, suggesting that interest rates should be reduced by at least 50 basis points to bring them to around 4%. He argues that Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s cautious and deliberate approach is slowing down necessary economic adjustments and says "The deliberateness of his thinking is too slow.”
Lack of Emergency Action Expected
While Siegel sees the need for immediate action, he doesn't anticipate an emergency rate cut, noting Powell's cautious approach. Instead, he calls for the Fed to send a clear message that it is ready to lower rates as rapidly as it raised them to correct past errors.
Contrasting Opinions on Rate Cuts
Not everyone agrees with Siegel’s assessment. Ed Yardeni, a seasoned market analyst and head of Yardeni Research Inc., described Siegel’s comments as "overly alarmist." Yardeni acknowledged that the Fed might cut rates soon, but likely only once this year. He emphasized that the upcoming economic data would likely show that the economy is still on track, reducing the urgency for aggressive rate cuts.
Yardeni also suggested that the Fed would likely push back against calls for rapid or emergency cuts, arguing that there is no need to bow to pressure from Wall Street or alarmed economists like Siegel.
THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSOR
Access AI Power Demand – A Global Utilities Portfolio with Higher Monthly Income
AI adds significant power demand to utilities. Investors traditionally like utilities for dividends and stability. Now, add a global perspective and covered calls and you get:
Scale: Broader exposure to reliable global utilities
Higher Income: Boosted monthly dividends from covered calls
Growth Potential: Enhanced by the increasing power demands driven by AI
Chat GPT queries are 6-10 times more power intensive than Google searches. The more generative AI is utilized by the general population, the more power will be required.
Chat GPT Queries vs Google Searches
In this recent piece, we explored the investment opportunities that this trend has encouraged. Global Utilities offer a unique advantage over their Canadian counterparts due to the concentration of data centers. The top global markets for data centers include the USA, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
HUTE – Global Utilities and Higher Monthly Cashflow
The Harvest Equal Weight Global utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE:TSX) offers investors access to a portfolio of globally diversified utilities. HUTE is built to deliver enhanced income and growth potential by applying modest leverage to an investment in the Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL:TSX).
Launched in October 2022, HUTE units have climbed 11.49% in the year-to-date period, 11.85% over 1-year, and 11.16% since inception as at July 31, 2024. HUTE recently increased its monthly cash distribution to $0.0880 per Unit. That represents a current yield of 10.56% as at August 7, 2024. It has delivered a high monthly cash distribution every month since inception.
Visit www.harvestetfs.com to see how they can assist you in achieving your financial goals.
Disclaimer
Commissions and management fees and other expenses may be associated with investing in Harvest ETFs. Their values change over time and past performances may not be repeated. Please read the relevant prospectus before investing.
THE BANK OF CANADA
Bank of Canada's Concerns Over Labor Market
Key Takeaways:
Bank of Canada expected to cut rates at each remaining meeting in 2024
Weak U.S. job market influencing Canadian policy
Canadian bond yields falling
Potential rebound in Canadian housing market
The Bank of Canada is increasingly worried about a weakening job market and its potential impact on economic recovery. Leading up to the July 24 rate cut, the central bank highlighted concerns that labor market issues could slow down growth.
“With the emergence of slack in the labour market, some members expressed concern that further weakness in the labour market could delay the rebound in consumption, putting downward pressure on growth and inflation.”
As inflation eases, the focus has shifted to the risk of falling short of the 2% inflation target.
Prospects for Further Rate Cuts
The bank’s key interest rate is currently at 4.5%, but further cuts could be on the horizon if the economy continues to struggle. The next decision is set for September 4. Royce Mendes, managing director at Desjardins, noted that central bankers felt a stronger urgency to reduce rates, citing "material risks" such as mortgage renewals and labor market challenges.
Economic Outlook and Rate Cut Expectations
The Canadian economy has managed to avoid a full-blown recession despite high interest rates, but signs of fragility are evident. Unemployment rose to 6.4% in June, and the upcoming July labor force survey will offer more insight into the job market.
Mendes expects the Bank of Canada to continue cutting rates into 2024, possibly reducing the key rate to 2.25% by late 2025. Governor Tiff Macklem emphasized that there is no "predetermined path" for future rate cuts as the bank seeks to balance growth and inflation.
LEGAL PT. 1
Landmark Ruling Against Google's Market Dominance
Key Takeaways:
Google ruled to have an illegal monopoly on online search.
U.S. Justice Department's major victory in antitrust case.
Google paid billions to secure default status on smartphones.
Next steps include potential company breakup or other remedies.
A U.S. federal judge has determined that Google unlawfully maintained a monopoly over online search and related advertising, marking a pivotal victory for antitrust authorities in their battle against Big Tech's market dominance. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, concludes that Google has abused its position to secure its control of approximately 90% of the online search market and 95% of searches on smartphones.
"The court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly.”
Strategic Payments to Maintain Dominance
One of the most striking revelations from the case was that Google paid $26.3 billion in 2021 alone to ensure its search engine remained the default option on smartphones and browsers, effectively shutting out competition. Judge Mehta highlighted the value of being the default search engine, emphasizing that any potential competitor would need to spend billions to even attempt to challenge Google's dominance.
"Even if a new entrant were positioned from a quality standpoint to bid for the default when an agreement expires, such a firm could compete only if it were prepared to pay partners upwards of billions of dollars,"
This financial barrier, he noted, protects Google's bottom line, with the loss of such agreements potentially leading to significant financial losses for the company.
Future Implications and Remedial Trial
The ruling sets the stage for a second trial that will explore potential remedies, which could include breaking up Google or forcing it to stop its practice of paying for default search engine status. Although Google has the opportunity to appeal, this decision marks the first significant antitrust victory against Big Tech in recent years.
Join the Investment RevolutionCheck out the latest exciting news at blossom! Blossom's tools make it simple to manage and analyze your investments, all linked directly to your brokerage account. |
LEGAL PT.2
Musk's X Forces Shutdown of Advertising Watchdog GARM
Key Takeaways:
GARM, an ad-industry nonprofit, shuts down after a lawsuit from Elon Musk’s X.
The lawsuit claims GARM conspired to withhold billions in advertising from X.
GARM denies wrongdoing but couldn’t sustain operations due to the lawsuit.
The case highlights growing tensions between Musk and advertisers.
Elon Musk's X, formerly known as Twitter, has successfully forced the closure of a major ad industry watchdog, the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM). This comes after X filed a lawsuit accusing GARM of illegally conspiring to boycott advertising on the platform. GARM, a nonprofit initiative aimed at preventing ads from appearing alongside harmful content, announced its dissolution just days after the lawsuit was filed.
"Recent allegations that unfortunately misconstrue its purpose and activities have caused a distraction and significantly drained its resources and finances."
Despite shutting down, GARM confirmed its intention to continue defending itself in court.
Lawsuit Details and Defendants
The lawsuit from X, owned by Musk, claimed that GARM organized a collective effort to withhold billions in advertising due to concerns that X had strayed from brand safety standards after Musk's acquisition in 2022. The suit named four major companies—CVS, Unilever, Mars, and Ørsted—as defendants.
It’s possible that this aggressive legal strategy may backfire, potentially alienating more advertisers from the platform. Nandini Jammi and Claire Atkin, founders of the watchdog group Check My Ads Institute, wrote that the lawsuit only underscores how risky advertising on X has become.
Background and Implications of GARM’s Closure
GARM was established in 2019 following the Christchurch Mosque shootings in New Zealand, where a terrorist attack was livestreamed on social media, leading to concerns about ad placement next to harmful content. Since its founding, GARM claimed it reduced such ads from 6.1% in 2020 to 1.7% in 2023.
From Novice to InvestorAre you a DIY investor looking for direction? Our online courses will take you from a complete beginner to a confident, knowledgeable investor. Start your journey with The Investing Academy. |
INVESTING (SORT OF)
Trump Media Reports Significant Financial Loss
Key Takeaways:
Trump Media reported a $16 million net loss for the recent quarter.
Revenue dropped 30% to $836,900, compared to $1.2 million in the same quarter last year.
Legal expenses and IT costs contributed to the losses.
Despite the losses, Trump Media claims a strong balance sheet with no debt.
Trump Media, the social media company owned by former President Donald Trump, reported a net loss of over $16 million for the latest financial quarter. This comes as the company, which operates the Truth Social app, saw its revenue decline sharply by 30%, dropping from $1.2 million last year to just $836,900 this quarter.
Contributing Factors to Financial Losses
The company attributed the substantial loss, which is slightly less than the $22.8 million loss from the same period in 2023, primarily to legal costs associated with its merger with Digital World Acquisition Corp. Trump Media stated that approximately half of the quarter’s losses were due to these legal expenses. Additionally, the company incurred $3.1 million in IT consulting and software licensing fees, largely related to the launch of its new TV streaming service, Truth+.
The report also highlighted a change in revenue-sharing agreements with an advertising partner, which Trump Media said was intended to stabilize the company’s financial position before its planned business combination. The company noted that its revenue has been fluctuating as it tests a new advertising initiative on Truth Social.
Financial Health and Future Prospects
Despite these challenges, Trump Media emphasized its strong financial position, ending the quarter with $344 million in cash and no debt. The company believes this solid balance sheet will support the continued expansion and improvement of its streaming platform, Truth+.
"With its strong balance sheet and zero debt load, the Company believes it has sufficient working capital to fund operations for the foreseeable future,"
Market Performance and Political Context
Meanwhile, Trump Media’s stock, trading under the DJT ticker, has taken a hit, closing at $26.21 per share, a significant drop from its high of over $71 per share earlier in the year. The company’s current market capitalization stands at nearly $5 billion, a high valuation given its modest sales.
ECONOMICS & THE FED
Trump Advocates Presidential Influence on Federal Reserve
Key Takeaways:
Donald Trump argues for presidential input on Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.
Trump criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell and suggested potential changes if elected.
The Fed's independence is a key issue, with opponents stressing its importance.
Trump’s Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris, supports Fed independence.
Form president Donald Trump has stirred debate by suggesting that the U.S. president should have a say in the Federal Reserve's decisions on interest rates.
"I feel the president should have at least [a] say in there...I think I have a better instinct than, in many cases, people that would be on the Federal Reserve or the chairman."
Speculation of Federal Reserve Reforms
Trump’s comments have heightened speculation about potential reforms to the Federal Reserve if he wins the November election. According to reports earlier this year, advisors close to Trump are considering changes that would require the Fed to consult with the president before making rate decisions. Other proposals include involving the Treasury Department in overseeing the Fed's actions.
During his previous term from 2017 to 2021, Trump frequently clashed with Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whom he appointed in 2018. Trump criticized Powell’s timing on interest rate decisions, accusing him of acting too early or too late. "It’s sort of gotten it wrong a lot," Trump said, highlighting his belief that economic decisions should be driven by "a gut feeling."
Despite his past criticism, Trump maintained that he and Powell "get along fine." However, his team is reportedly considering replacing Powell or not reappointing him when his term as chair expires in 2026.
The Principle of Federal Reserve Independence
The Federal Reserve has traditionally operated independently of political influence, a principle that Fed officials, including Powell, have consistently defended. Trump’s Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, supports this independence. An aide to Harris stated that the Fed should continue making decisions without presidential interference.
The Fed has faced scrutiny for its handling of interest rates, particularly for delaying rate hikes when inflation surged in 2021. Recently, some, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, have urged the Fed to lower rates as inflation cools. Between March 2022 and July 2023, the Fed raised benchmark interest rates by 5.25 percentage points to combat inflation, with markets now expecting potential rate cuts as early as September.
Listen On the GoDid you know our YouTube content is available as a podcast? |
Market Movers
Top 10 Weekly Gainers
TSX, NYSE & Nasdaq Exchanges | Market Cap >$10B | Week ending August 9, 2024
Top 10 Weekly Losers
TSX, NYSE & Nasdaq Exchanges | Market Cap >$10B | Week ending August 9, 2024
10 Most Overbought Stocks
10 Most Oversold Stocks
Week ending August 9, 2024 | Most Oversold Stocks, based on 14-Day RSI
The Relative Strength Indicator (RSI) can provide a signal that suggest a stock is either overbought or oversold.
📈A stock that has an RSI over 70 is considered to be in “overbought” territory. This might suggest that the stock is due for a pullback, however it is not a recommendation to sell.
📉A stock that is trading with an RSI below 30 is considered to be in “oversold” territory. This might suggest that the stock is due for a recovery, however it is not a recommendation to buy. Always perform your own due diligence.
The views expressed herein by Beavis Wealth regarding a particular company, security, industry, or market sector should not be considered as an indication of trading intent of any investment funds managed by BMO Global Asset Management. Any reference to a particular company is for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell nor should it be considered as an indication of how the portfolio of any investment fund managed by BMO Global Asset Management is or will be invested. This social media network is an independent organization and is not affiliated with BMO Global Asset Management.
BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate.